After two days over-extended Session
of COP-25 of climate change conference at Madrid ended on 15 December without concrete result
to achieve an emission pathway agreed in Paris agreement. Despite all attempt of
negotiations member-states failed to respond to climate change emergency situation
as showcased by IPCC report and economic compulsion surpassed the ambitious
modalities of Paris agreement and warsaw loss and damage mechanism.
As vulnerable nations contention
suffered blow due to slow pace of COP-25
development. On final day of climate change conference. Observers of the summit in Madrid held
G20 countries – especially with the US, Brazil, Australia, Saudi Arabia and
major oil, gas and coal companies responsible for undermining the climate
ambition and blocking the progress for a better response to this global
challenge. Canada, Japan, China and India were also faulted for their
complacency as they failed to support vulnerable nations in the face of brutal
impacts and push for a more robust collective response in 2020. The EU tried to
play its role as bridge-builder between developing and developed countries. All
the implementation and global stocktaking of climate-resilient effort of
mitigation, adaptation and funding was discussed with due diligence but the interest of oil-exporting countries and developed nations failure to start an action
plan moved the summit towards disappointing note. As final day of the conference
ended with an eye-opener release of Climate
Change Performance Index, 2019 which
showed lethargic response to climate change combat response as none of the
countries were able to secure top-three spot in climate-resilient performance
to combat climate change.
CLIMATE
CHANGE PERFORMANCE INDEX 2019
Sweden gained fourth position and topped
in the ranking followed by Denmark at the second spot. As per the statistics, India
has reason to cheer as it stood at 9th position with score of 66.02
for the first time on the basis of its INDC with the ambition of 175 GW renewable
energy target and phasing out fossil fuel power plant dependency. India’s performance has shown 21% GHG
emission reduction in GDP measures as per said 33% commitment level. As per
global climate change risk index, India is fifth most climate affected nation
and suffered second-highest losses in 2018 due to climate change disaster such
as flood, cyclone and drought occurrence as Japan is at the top in climate change
risk index which was released in last week. If we analyze the climate change
performance index Chinese Taipei, Saudi Arabia and USA are among the nation are the worst performer. As the USA, has shown sign of interest to rejoin the Paris
Agreement. This climate change performance index is meant for enhancing the
transparency in international climate change economics and politics to showcase the real response of nations towards combating the climate change status.
This Climate Change Performance Index evaluates the progress of countries on the
methodology of four Indicators (1.GHG EMISSION 40%, 2. RENEWABLE ENERGY 20%, 3.
ENERGY USE 20%, 4. CLIMATE POLICY 20%) and so far, involves 57 countries in its
inclusion study.
India’s
performance in climate change performance index is laudable as it is for the
first time ranked at 9th position due to its submitted INDC as well
as adherence towards 175GW renewable energy goal implementation in action plan.
India accounts for 4.5% of world GHG emission. India’s action in mitigation and
adaptation plan influenced the researchers as it has gained its forest cover
through its Compulsory Afforestation Act creating carbon sink. Further, SOLAR
ALLIANCE and National Action Plan on climate change state action plan on
climate change, FAME scheme for e-mobility, Ujjala Yojana replacing the traditional bulb with LED bulb
and Swacch Bharat mission turned statistics in India’s favour which gained
international encouragement, but India has still massive challenges to be resolved with respect to cleaning of rivers, food
security and air pollution which is an uphill task to be settled.
COMMON BUT DIFFERENTIATED RESPONSIBILITY A
COMPROMISED PRINCIPLE AT CONFERENCE
CBDR principle
of Paris agreement this time met with disappointment as carbon marketing
Negotiators failed to reach an outcome on carbon markets. In the final hours of
negotiations, over 30 governments joined behind Sanjones principle in an
effort to preserve the integrity of carbon market rules and prevent loopholes
and the ability for double-counting carbon credits as this mechanism was bed
rock towards adaptation and mitigation factor to combat climate change. Further, the
framework defined by Article 6 of the Paris Agreement is divided into three sections.
Article 6.2 makes way for countries to go for bilateral and voluntary
agreements to trade carbon credits. Article 6.4 ask for centralized governance
system for countries and the private sector to trade emissions reduction
anywhere based on the Sustainable Development Mechanism (SDM) to be substituted
for the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), made under the Kyoto Protocol text. This
above-mentioned system created to reduce the economic burden and share this burden with cooperation in order to push the economy, such that sudden change
in modus operandi may reduce the economic sector due to environment-friendly
approach and impacts on industries. Now only the possibility and hope of climate activist and climate
change action burden is shifted to COP-26 Glasgow which will be now or never
action for climate change to save the mother earth from the monster of climate
change.
0 Comments