CULTURAL
INTROJECTS AND INTRODUCTION
The age-old idea of corporal punishment hails its origin from the notion. “Spare
the rod and spoil the child”. Perhaps, the similar imitation can be detected
in the Indian scenario “Lalayat pancha barsani, dasabarsani tarayat , prapte tu
shorase”. Which translates as: - pamper and love the child till 5, punish him up to 10 and when he
reaches 15 treat him as a friend. India
incorporates plethora of cultures and majority thereof realizes the domination
of parents & teachers over children. In a studyi 90 per cent of
the parents participated, justified deployment of force as against their
children, to rear children properly as responsible citizens. Cultural
relativismii is another argument validating use of force against
minors. “Matha, Pitha, Guru, deivam” is a revered
dictum prevalent between masses in Kerala. Most of civilized society allows the reasonable use of
force against children for enforcing discipline and to inculcate values in
them. An astounding data released by UNICEFiii revealed, from 2005 – 2013, 6 out of
every 10 children were subject to corporal punishment by adults in 56 various
countries. By and large the situation in India is not different. iv80
percent of marginalized children face regular animosities from their teachers
on regular basis. These abhorrent practices can be well founded in axioms and
bygone ancient scripts. It’s a high time to draw line between
reasonable corporal punishment and abuse. This article attempts to answer
dilemma over corporal punishment against minors and its jurisprudence.
DEFINITION
UN committee on rights of the child explicates
corporal punishment as “any punishment in which physical force is used and intended to cause some degree of pain or discomfort, however light”. Oxford
English dictionary defines corporal punishment as “punishment inflicted on the
body; originally including death, mutilation, branding, bodily confinement,
irons, the pillory etc”. The plain perusal of the definitions perhaps provides only the prima facie
meaning of corporal punishment. But on a deeper understanding the purview of
corporal punishment is comprehensive and
therefore includes but not limited to many other settings of non- physical
forms of
punishments like belittles,
humiliates, denigrates, threatens, scares , scapegoats or ridicule the child. Section 89 and 88 of Indian Penal Code, 1860
safeguard wrongdoers of corporal punishment against children from prosecution
under the defense of good faith and moderate usage of corporal punishment to
enforce discipline.
Comparing In Loco Parentis and Indian law
The parent
or guardian means a biological or adoptive parent whose parental rights have
not been terminated. The Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 renders wider definition
of guardian /parent. According to section 4 (2) of the
aforementioned act “guardian mean’s a person having the care of the person of a
minor or of his property, or of both is person and property:” Section 2(3) of
the same act says ward means
a minor for whose person or property, or both, there is a guardian. ‘In Loco Parentis’ is a
legal doctrine which means ‘in place of a parent’. Normally, parents hold the
authority over their respective child or children as the case may be. This doctrine transfers the
responsibility and appropriates the parental authority over school personnel
when child is at school’s or education institution’s
jurisdiction.
Provided that no right can be exercised by school personnel over property of a minor.
In the case of State of Florida vs. Rayderv, some principles of corporal punishment in relation to ‘In Loco Parentis’ doctrine were explained, the court opined that:-except out of malice or cruelty , the teacher (In Loco Parentis) can exercise or use reasonable corporal for prevalence of discipline and order in the class.
CONSEQUENCES
Chastising children often can cause symptoms of withdrawal and psychological stress. Beating with iron or wooden stick, spanking, twisting ear lobes etc may result in the death or may cause grievous physical injuries to the children. Moreover, corporal punishment can impair the cognitive abilities and other development of the child. The children who are subject to regular corporal punishment may over time develop aversion against studies aftermath of which is increased dropout from educational institutions. More often than not the children who get subjected to abhorrent physical abuse develop anti-social behavior. Reckless and unreasonable deployment force against minors perhaps creates future adults who adhere to the ideology of violence against children.
LAWS PERTAINING TO CORPORAL PUNISHMENT
International laws
UN Convention on Right of the Child (UNCRC) is the most widely-ratified international law. It consists of 54 articles fostering human rights for the children.
- Article 19 (1) :- obligates every states to create legislative, administrative and social measures to protect children from all forms of physical or mental violence and abuse
- Article 37(a) to (d) stipulates states to protect children from cruelty or any kind of abuse and to save liberty for the children
- Article 28(8) provides that schools should only administer discipline in a manner consistent with human dignity and with conformity to the present convention (UNCRC).
INDIAN CONSTITUTION AND OTHER LEGAL PROVISIONS
- Article 21
and 21A ascertains dignity of the children under right to life and provides for
free and compulsory education till the age 14
- Article 39 (e) and (f) stipulates the state to
provide healthy environment for the development of the children and to secure
tender aged children from exploitation.
Hansmukhbhai Golakdas shah vs State of Gujaratvi:- In this case it was held that violence wreaked against child infringes the dignity of the child guaranteed under article 21 of the Indian constitution.
Section
17(1) of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009
prohibits usage of mental harassment or physical punishment against children
There are several penal provisions under Indian Penal Code, 1860 that can be invoked against perpetrators who use corporal punishment against children. Some of them are:-
- Section 305: Abetment of suicide committed by a child;
- Section 323: Voluntarily causing hurt;
- Section 325: Voluntarily causing grievous hurt;
- Section 326: Voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous weapons or means;
- Section 352: Assault or use of criminal force otherwise than a grave provocation;
- Section 354: Outraging the modesty of a woman;
- Section 506: Criminal intimidation
- Section 509: Word, gesture or act intended to insult the modesty of a woman
CONCLUSION
Even
creation of million laws against corporal punishment will not work until and unless it’s strictly executed on the grounds. Moreover, redefining
teacher-student and child-parent relation to more liberal relation than one in
which one hold authority over another, is important to reduce corporal
punishment against children. People need to be aware of the laws against
corporal punishment. Every teacher or parent must strictly observe child rights
in their milieu.
“THE TRUE CHARACTER OF A SOCIETY IS REVEALED IN HOW IT TREATS ITS CHILDREN”- NELSON MANDELA
References
- https://www.researchgate.net/publication/26592639_Who_is_A_Child_The_Adults'_Perspective_within_AdultChild_Relationship_in_India
- https://www.jstor.org/stable/25766393
- https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/corporal-punishment-and-health#:~:text=Corporal%20or%20physical%20punishment%20is,physically%20punished%20by%20school%20staff
- https://www.business-standard.com/article/current-affairs/88-of-marginalised-children-beaten-at-school-91parents-okay-with-it-118112200092_1.html
- State of Florida v. Rayder, No. 70-62 16, Criminal Court of Record, Dade County, Florida (1970).
- 2009 Cri LJ 2919
MyLawman is now on Telegram (t.me/mylawman) Follow us for regular legal updates. Follow us on Google News, Instagram, LinkedIn, Facebook & Twitter, or join our WhatsApp group. You can also subscribe to our Newsletter for Email Updates.
1 Comments
Informative 🙌🏼
ReplyDelete